Public sample report

A demo report built for agency evaluation.

This is a static sample that shows the full structure of a GeoAscend audit report: 7-dimension scoring, competitor map, prompt clusters, page-level proof, and fix preview.

Back to landing

Overall score

84

Demo data

Executive summary

This editorial/affiliate site has strong mention rates in ChatGPT and partial visibility in Perplexity, but competitor review sites dominate local comparison prompts. Citation readiness is moderate — key pages are cited but coverage gaps exist in buyer guide and alternatives queries.

Score breakdown

Non-branded visibility30%
28/100
Citation share + quality20%
18/100
Competitor gap15%
12/100
Technical AI-readiness15%
10/100
Topic / entity coverage10%
8/100
Cross-engine consistency5%
4/100
Measurement readiness5%
4/100

Methodology

This audit queried 4 AI engines with 12 standardized prompts across 6 clusters. Scores use a 7-dimension weighted formula. Branded queries are capped at 10-15% of the overall score.

Read the full methodology

Confidence

High confidence

4 engines queried, 12 prompts across 6 clusters, 18 pages crawled, fresh crawl. Sample size supports reliable scoring.

4 engines | 12 queries | 6 clusters | 18 pages | 14 competitors

Branded vs non-branded

10

Non-branded queries

2

Branded queries

2 of 12 prompts are branded (17%). Branded score contribution is capped at 10-15% per methodology — prompt count is not restricted, only scoring weight.

Audit coverage

18

Pages crawled

6

Categories detected

6/10

Clusters covered

14

Competitor candidates

17%

Branded ratio

4/4

Engines queried

Engine breakdown

ChatGPT

Mentioned in 10/12 queries

Strong

Perplexity

Mentioned in 6/12 queries

Partial

Gemini

Mentioned in 4/12 queries

Low

Claude

Mentioned in 3/12 queries

Low

Query breakdown (12 prompts across 6 clusters)

best smart glasses 2024

Mentioned in 2 of 4 engines

best_of

top wireless earbuds review

Mentioned in 2 of 4 engines

best_of

smart rings buying guide

Mentioned in 2 of 4 engines

buyer_guide

AirPods Pro vs Galaxy Buds

Mentioned in 2 of 4 engines

alternatives_vs

smart glasses vs AR glasses

Mentioned in 2 of 4 engines

alternatives_vs

Oura Ring alternatives

Mentioned in 2 of 4 engines

alternatives_vs

best wearables for fitness

Mentioned in 2 of 4 engines

use_case

best noise cancelling earbuds

Mentioned in 2 of 4 engines

category_solution

best smart glasses for running

Mentioned in 2 of 4 engines

use_case

smartwearables.io reviews

Mentioned in 2 of 4 engines

branded

smartwearables.io methodology

Mentioned in 2 of 4 engines

branded

is smartwearables.io legit

Mentioned in 2 of 4 engines

trust_reviews

Competitor map

Primary competitors (same archetype — review/editorial)

Sites that compete for the same editorial/review audience

tomsguide.comCited 8x, mentioned in 4/4 engines

Same editorial archetype; linked from 4 comparison pages; cited in buyer-guide and best-of prompts

rtings.comCited 6x, mentioned in 3/4 engines

Same review archetype; linked from 3 product pages; cited in alternatives prompts

soundguys.comCited 3x, mentioned in 2/4 engines

Same audio review archetype; co-cited with brand in 2 engine responses

Secondary commercial (marketplace/retailer)

Retailers that appear in product purchase queries

amazon.comCited 12x, mentioned in 4/4 engines

Top marketplace; cited in 4/4 engines across all product categories

bestbuy.comCited 4x, mentioned in 3/4 engines

Retail competitor; cited in price-comparison prompts

walmart.comCited 2x, mentioned in 1/4 engines

Retail; cited in value/budget prompts

Brand entities (manufacturers in AI answers)

Product brands that AI engines surface alongside reviews

apple.comMentioned in 4/4 engines

AirPods/Watch manufacturer; brand entity in 4/4 engines

ray-ban.comMentioned in 3/4 engines

Smart glasses manufacturer; brand entity in Meta Ray-Ban prompts

samsung.comMentioned in 3/4 engines

Galaxy Buds manufacturer; brand entity in comparison prompts

bose.comMentioned in 2/4 engines

Headphones manufacturer; brand entity in audio review prompts

Citation sources (non-competitor evidence)

Authoritative sources cited by AI engines as evidence

cnet.comCited 5x

Authority publisher; cited as editorial evidence in 3 engines

pcmag.comCited 4x

Authority publisher; cited as benchmark evidence in 2 engines

wired.comCited 3x

Authority publisher; cited for product news

theverge.comCited 2x

Tech publisher; cited for launch coverage

Page-level proof

Pages cited in AI answers

/best-smart-glasses-2024ChatGPT, Perplexity
/apple-airpods-pro-3-reviewChatGPT, Gemini
/oura-ring-gen-4-reviewPerplexity
/best-wireless-earbudsChatGPT

Pages not cited (opportunities)

/smart-rings-comparisonStrong content, not cited — opportunity
/wearables-buying-guideComprehensive guide, no citations
/aboutTrust page, not cited
/contactNot cited

Top findings

Competitor editorial sites (tomsguide.com, rtings.com) are cited more frequently in comparison and buyer guide prompts.
Key category pages exist but are not cited — smart rings comparison and wearables buyer guide pages have no citations despite strong content.
Technical AI-readiness is moderate: JSON-LD Organization schema present, but no Product or FAQPage schema detected. Sitemap is shallow.
Cross-engine visibility drops significantly from ChatGPT (10/12 mentions) to Claude (3/12 mentions), suggesting engine-specific content gaps.

Top fixes preview

Add Product and FAQPage schema to top comparison pages.
Expand sitemap to include all category hub pages and buyer guides.
Create a dedicated "alternatives" landing page for each major product category.
Strengthen internal linking from brand/trust pages to high-value comparison pages.
Add structured FAQ blocks to the top 5 comparison pages using local-intent queries.

Generated asset preview

## Smart glasses comparison page brief

- Core focus: best smart glasses for running, cycling, everyday use
- Add Product schema (JSON-LD) per model reviewed
- Add FAQPage schema with 5 entries from buyer guide queries
- Strengthen internal links to brand/trust/methodology pages
- Add structured comparison table with scores, pros/cons

This page is a static sample and does not represent a live customer scan.

View pricingStart your own audit